Noah Miller, Author at Scotsman Guide https://www.scotsmanguide.com The leading resource for mortgage originators. Fri, 29 Dec 2023 20:14:48 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0.2 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/files/sites/2/2023/02/Icon_170x170-150x150.png Noah Miller, Author at Scotsman Guide https://www.scotsmanguide.com 32 32 Make the Math Work for You https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/make-the-math-work-for-you/ Mon, 01 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/?p=65752 Mortgage brokers must understand the basics of commercial real estate valuations

The post Make the Math Work for You appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
At a time when the Federal Reserve has increased benchmark interest rates at a record pace (11 times since March 2022), it’s no wonder mortgage professionals are having a difficult time valuing commercial properties. Additionally, fears of crashing values have spooked the market. Capital Economics estimated this past summer that commercial real estate values could crater by as much as 40% in some major cities.

As a mortgage broker engaged to procure financing, one must have the ability to determine market values, especially in a fast-changing environment. Borrowers and lenders alike rely on brokers to guide the conversation around property values, thus determining the ability to finance these assets.

While some lenders will require an appraisal, a broker’s opinion of value will hold more weight when working with a private money lender. There are two primary methods for valuing commercial real estate — the income approach and the sales approach — that brokers should thoroughly understand.

Income approach

The income approach dives deep into the financial health of a property. It is a fundamental method for appraising a variety of income-producing properties, from office buildings and warehouses to apartment communities and shopping centers.

This approach estimates value based on the current income or the future income to be generated by the property. The primary components of the income approach are the net operating income (NOI) and the capitalization rate.

“As a mortgage broker engaged to procure financing, one must have the ability to determine market values, especially in a fast-changing environment.”

NOI is calculated by subtracting all operating expenses (excluding mortgage payments) from the property’s gross income. Operating expenses include property management, maintenance, insurance, utilities and property taxes. While each asset has its own specific expense structure, it is common for expenses to range from 25% to 50% of the gross income.

Take, for example, an apartment building that collects $150,000 a year in gross rental income and has expenses of $50,000 (a 33% expense ratio). In this instance, the NOI totals $100,000.

The capitalization rate, meanwhile, represents the investor’s expected rate of return on a property and is one of the most widely used formulas to determine value. To calculate the cap rate, divide the NOI by the property’s current value. If the aforementioned apartment community with a yearly net income of $100,000 is valued at $2 million, the cap rate is 5%.

Conversely, an investor seeking to purchase a property can determine its value based on their desired rate of return. If an investor requires an annual return of 8% on the same apartment building, for example, they would divide the NOI of $100,000 by the cap rate of 8%. This would lower the estimated value of the property to $1,250,000.

Cap rate expectations

Although cap rates are subjective and are based on an investor’s required profit margin, there are generally accepted cap rates throughout the marketplace. Over the past few years, investors have typically used cap rates of 4% to 9% to determine values.

Typically, lower cap rates are used for higher-quality properties in primary markets that are considered safer and thus yield a lower return. Conversely, higher cap rates are used for lower-quality properties in secondary and tertiary markets where investors need a higher yield to compensate for the additional risk.

Since cap rates adjust based on location, demand and interest rates, it’s important to stay up to date on currently acceptable ratios. As a rule of thumb, cap rates are typically 1% to 2% higher than current interest rates, which saw historically fast upward movements from 2022 to 2023.

Be sure to reach out to local sales brokers to get a good sense of market cap rates. You should also take advantage of the research reports published by major real estate companies (including CBRE, JLL and Cushman & Wakefield) that offer a variety of market insights.

The income approach is particularly valuable for income-producing properties as it directly considers the property’s potential to generate revenue. But it’s essential to have accurate income and expense data when calculating the NOI and selecting an appropriate cap rate.

Sales approach

The sales approach (also known as the comparison approach or market approach) is another common method to determine the value of a commercial property. This approach relies on analysis of recent sales of similar properties in the same market to estimate the subject property’s value.

To begin, gather data on recently sold properties that are as similar as possible to the subject property in terms of size, location, age and use. These properties are referred to as “comps” or “comparables.” This information can be provided by real estate brokers, collected from public records, or downloaded from data aggregation services such as CoStar or Crexi.

Once this information is collected, the focus turns to the price per square foot (PSF). For example, if a similar property of 10,000 square feet recently sold for $1.5 million, the PSF is $150. Determine the PSF for each of the comparable properties and calculate an average. Once you have an average PSF, a value for the subject property can easily be determined.

While the sales approach is relatively simple and straightforward, there are a few items to consider to ensure that values are accurate. First, make sure the comparable properties are truly comparable. For example, one should not compare a property built in 2020 with one from the 1960s as the values will be drastically different.

You could have two identical buildings that are in different locations, which could equate to vastly different values. Always remember the old adage of “location, location, location,” as investors are willing to pay higher prices for real estate in better locations.

The sales approach is particularly useful when there is an active market with a sufficient number of comparable sales. Naturally, it may be less reliable for specialty properties, or ones that lack recent comparable sales data.

● ● ●

Until the commercial real estate market stabilizes, it will continue to be difficult to obtain financing for transitional and cash-flowing properties. Mortgage brokers who master these valuation approaches will thrive by helping clients make informed decisions, maximize returns and secure favorable debt for their real estate portfolios. ●

The post Make the Math Work for You appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
A New Normal Requires New Strategies https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/a-new-normal-requires-new-strategies/ Sat, 01 Jul 2023 17:16:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/?p=62336 In troubled times, mortgage brokers can lean on private lending partnerships

The post A New Normal Requires New Strategies appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
As interest rates remain relatively high and banks limit their lending volumes, it’s no surprise that originations have slowed. Bloomberg recently reported that commercial bank lending dropped by nearly $105 billion in the last two weeks of March 2023, the largest such decline in Federal Reserve data going back to 1973. Commercial mortgages accounted for more than one-third of this decrease.

“While a price premium will be paid, there are many reasons that a broker would advise their borrower to consider a private lender. These include a quicker approval and funding time frame.”

This type of news can leave mortgage brokers scratching their heads as they try to figure out how to best adapt to a changing market. Sometimes overlooked by brokers is the fact that strategic relationships with private lenders may become the new standard, both as a reliable lending source and a way for brokers to diversify their own investment portfolios.

Private lending explained

Private lending refers to a type of mortgage financing in which individuals or private companies lend money to borrowers rather than traditional institutions such as banks or credit unions. Instead of having a fixed interest rate or terms as bank loans do, the terms of private loans are negotiated directly between the borrower and the lender. This can provide greater flexibility for the borrower in terms of the leverage, interest rate, repayment schedule and collateral.

The use of private lending sources can be beneficial to commercial mortgage brokers whose clients may not qualify for traditional bank financing for a variety of reasons. While many banks and other conventional lenders have stringent guidelines — e.g., minimum debt-service-coverage ratios or seasoning requirements — private lenders tend to be extremely flexible and often provide loans that banks would not typically fund.

Brokers choose to work with private lenders for a number of reasons, including when there is a short time frame to close, the property is in distress or the borrower has a lower credit score. To compensate for their flexibility and greater risk tolerance, private lenders charge higher interest rates (commonly between 10% to 12%) than traditional lenders.

Costs vs. benefits

While a price premium will be paid, there are many reasons that a broker would advise their borrower to consider a private lender. These include a quicker approval and funding time frame.

Because private lenders have autonomy, they don’t have mandated underwriting guidelines and are opportunistic in nature. They are able to approve loans much more quickly than traditional banks — frequently within a matter of days. Additionally, since private lenders tend to fund directly off their balance sheets, it is common for them to fund deals without the third-party reports (such as appraisals or environmental studies) that banks require.

There is also term flexibility. While traditional lending sources typically stick to five-, seven- or 10-year terms with standard amortizing schedules, private lenders can be flexible to meet the needs of the borrower. Examples include a 12-month loan with interest-only payments or a 24-month loan with no prepayment penalties.

It also tends to be easier to have a direct conversation with a private lender. These are typically smaller organizations that cater to brokers with individualized attention, including direct communications with decisionmakers. This can be helpful for brokers whose borrowers don’t quality for traditional financing or when the deal in question involves a property in transition.

Sourcing the funds

There are two common ways that private lenders are capitalized. The first is through a bank line of credit, which utilizes a financial concept of earnings from a spread. With this method, a private lender might borrow $10 million from a bank at a 5% interest rate, lend it out at 8%, and keep the 3% difference as their profit or spread. This method has been used for decades, but as rates have increased and banks have limited their lending activities, private companies are having a difficult time using this method.

Another way that private lenders raise capital is through individual investors, family members and friends who are looking to diversify their portfolios. Similar to stocks and bonds, individuals can actually invest in commercial mortgages by owning either partial shares or the entire loan. This type of investment offers an opportunity to earn stable returns with relatively lower risk compared to other types of investment vehicles.

The process of investing in private mortgages can vary depending on the investor’s preferences, appetite and available opportunities. Generally, it is done through a mortgage fund, which is set up for the purpose of pooling investor capital and lending it out. The fund does all the work associated with the loan, including origination, underwriting of the property and borrower, conducting due diligence, closing and servicing. Additionally, if an issue arises, the fund will be able to lead any foreclosure process, which can be complex, arduous and require out-of-pocket costs.

A mortgage fund allows individuals to be passive while enjoying the benefits of mortgage investing. In exchange for leading the process, fund managers receive their compensation through upfront fees or an annual spread. If a broker is looking to secure a loan from a fund, they should make sure to do their homework on the company and its leadership team. Meet with them in person and ask them to provide examples of loans they’ve closed, the number of loans in their portfolio that have defaulted and how they’ve handled foreclosures in the past.

Mortgage broker tips

In a new market where debt financing is harder to originate, mortgage brokers can stay ahead of the curve by sourcing a private lender database, understanding their lending programs and knowing each lender’s due-diligence requirements. Having foresight on these items will allow mortgage brokers to match borrowers with the appropriate private lenders.

While there are many private lenders available, they each have their own criteria for property types they lend on, available terms, rates, leverage amounts and even borrower requirements. As a mortgage broker, it is imperative to understand each lender’s guidelines to present them with the right types of deals and borrowers.

Remember that the last thing private lenders want is an inbox full of deals that do not meet their lending guidelines. Understanding each lender’s criteria will streamline the origination process, allowing for faster lender quotes and smoother closings.

Real estate is a relationship business, so mortgage brokers need to develop personal relationships with lenders through educational phone calls, in-person meetings and — most importantly — the delivery of high-quality loan scenarios. Brokers should strive to go above and beyond to assist lenders during the due-diligence process. This includes presenting a complete deal story, providing all required documentation, and coaching borrowers on expectations and loan requirements. The brokers who are willing to put in the extra work to achieve direct relationships with lenders and perform during the closing process will ensure successful times ahead.

● ● ●

To thrive in a changing economy, commercial mortgage brokers must be able to adapt to a new norm in which private lenders will be a top choice for borrowers in need of capital. It is worthwhile for brokers to get to know multiple private lenders and understand their programs, origination processes and management teams. Additionally, for brokers looking to diversify their own portfolios, consider an investment in a private lender with a proven track record, an experienced management team and strong underwriting
standards. ●

The post A New Normal Requires New Strategies appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Stress Relief Measures https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/stress-relief-measures/ Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:00:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/?p=59484 Commercial mortgage lenders employ strategies in a downturn to save troubled assets

The post Stress Relief Measures appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Let’s face it: The days of historically low interest rates, strong real estate values and timely tenant payments have faded into the sunset. If inflation is a friend to landlords because prices and rents rise, then a recession is a foe because prices and rents usually fall — helping to create a challenging landscape for commercial mortgage lenders, brokers and borrowers.

It’s no secret that lenders are scrambling to manage late-paying and nonpaying borrowers. Delinquencies and foreclosures weaken portfolios and lower property values, which push loan-to-value ratios above their required thresholds. And as commercial real estate lending continues to slow and the number of distressed properties increases, mortgage originators are increasingly likely to broker distressed debt. The brokers who are agile enough to make this change need to understand how to manage distressed debt, which is poised to be an issue throughout the coming year.

Distressed debt overview

Distressed debt is defined as a loan that is not performing as originally anticipated, and it is frequently described as either nonperforming or subperforming. Nonperforming loans (NPLs) are those where the borrower is no longer able to meet their obligations, causing a default. This category can include borrowers who haven’t made payments for a period of time, as well as those with loans that have reached maturity and are unable to be refinanced. NPLs are a significant risk for lenders and often result in portfolio losses.

Subperforming loans (SPLs) are typically categorized as loans that may not officially be in default but are not performing up to the standards set in the loan agreement. Examples include those that are past due for more than 30 days, or those that are frequently paid late. While SPLs are generally considered to have less risk than NPLs, it is equally important for lenders to closely monitor whether the borrower’s financial situation improves in a timely manner.

Distressed debt is a heavy burden for lenders to bear. It often ties up significant time and money while draining precious resources. Veteran mortgage brokers who have made it through major economic recessions in the past know that it’s common for lenders and borrowers to painfully fight it out in court for years before resolutions are reached, causing turmoil for both parties.

Working through problems

To avoid such difficulties, brokers need to address troubled assets with their clients. The first option for a broker is to educate a lender on how to work with clients to restructure troubled loans. If a borrower cannot make the monthly payments due to a rise in interest rates or a temporary tenant vacancy, for example, the lender may consider lowering the payments or delaying select payments until the payoff date to give the borrower some breathing room.

Although creative restructuring attempts are common, if the loan has an upcoming maturity date and the borrower is having trouble refinancing, the lender may consider extending the loan term to give the borrower more time. If the lender is uncomfortable with the current value of the collateral, it can request for the borrower to provide an equity infusion (also called a cash-in refinance) to mitigate the risk. A broker can work with the client to complete the equity infusion or even source a second mortgage for them to make up the gap. This move may help the client get back on track with their payments and avoid default. Since it can take months or even years to work through a foreclosure process, time is of the essence.

Although the above option is the preferred method, sometimes working with a borrower is not feasible and more drastic efforts need to be taken to address impending risk. Managing a hostile borrower who is unwilling to collaborate on solutions can cause immense stress for brokers and lenders. This is especially true for commercial mortgage professionals who entered the business in the past 10 to 12 years, a period where they were most likely focused on origination efforts rather than workout strategies.

“Knowledgeable brokers can help lenders analyze the best options to manage portfolio risk exposure and emerge from the current market cycle as unscathed as possible.”

The result is an industry that is oversaturated with professionals ill-equipped to manage the nuances of working through subperforming and nonperforming loans. The good news is that there are niche companies that specialize in servicing distressed debt, marking a light at the end of a dark tunnel for lenders that need support in times of crisis.

Special loan servicers

A lender that is experiencing an increase in troubled assets should consider bringing on a special servicer. This party can implement strategies to manage a borrower in default, or even a foreclosure process down the road.

When looking for a special loan servicer, it’s important to find one that can meet the needs of a specific portfolio (i.e., different asset classes or deal types). There is no one-size-fits-all solution to debt management, so lenders that get a head start on interviewing multiple brokers and servicers will ultimately have greater levels of success. To start, experience and expertise in dealing with defaulted loans and foreclosure processes in the markets you are active in is a must.

It also is imperative to remember that each state has its own laws regarding defaults and foreclosures, so lenders often must tap multiple regional servicers if their real estate portfolio spans state borders. Of course, having a clear understanding of compensation strategies is key. Some special servicers charge a flat fee, while others will charge a percentage of any profits gained.

Seeking an exit

For lenders seeking an exit plan, brokers can facilitate the sale of loans, which can provide immediate liquidity and eliminate risk as the lender is no longer responsible for the performance of the loans being sold. When selling distressed debt, there are multiple options, and knowledgeable brokers can help lenders analyze the best options to manage portfolio risk exposure and emerge from the current market cycle as unscathed as possible.

One option is to sell the loan at par, meaning the buyer pays the face value of the loan. For example, if the outstanding loan balance is $500,000, the buyer would pay the current lender $500,000 for the loan. There are even times when a buyer may be willing to pay par, plus any interest owed, or reimburse the lender for items such as attorney fees.

Commercial mortgage brokers will have an easier time selling loans at par if the outstanding balance involves low leverage, the property is in a high-quality market or there’s a high likelihood that the borrower will eventually start performing on the loan. For lenders selling distressed debt, this is a solid option to recoup the principal balance and eliminate any further risk.

For riskier loans, lenders may be forced to sell below par, also known as a discounted sale. In these cases, the buyer pays less than the face value of the loan in exchange for taking on the risk of attempting to recover the full value of the remaining balance.

For example, if the outstanding loan balance is $500,000 but the market perceives it as being risky, a buyer may only be comfortable paying $400,000. The buyer may require a discount for many reasons, including a highly leveraged loan, a destabilized property with many vacancies, an asset that is in poor physical condition or one that is not in a prime location. While the seller of the loan will take a loss, it may be worthwhile if they need liquidity or believe the situation will get worse if they hold onto the loan.

● ● ●

Many U.S. mortgage lenders and borrowers are facing possible financial trouble. An experienced broker can be invaluable to help both parties navigate choppy waters. There is much to evaluate when managing a loan portfolio amid an economic recession, but the winners are those who have mastered the art of swift and strategic decisionmaking. For inexperienced or unprepared lenders, now is the time to shed risk. ●

The post Stress Relief Measures appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Hidden Treasures https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/hidden-treasures/ Thu, 01 Dec 2022 09:00:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/uncategorized/hidden-treasures/ Joint venture equity may be a solution for smaller real estate deals

The post Hidden Treasures appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Commercial property prices remain high, interest rates and inflation continue to rise, and the country has been staring down the brink of a recession for the past two years. At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were a record number of real estate sales and plenty of capital, but today banks are tightening guidelines and private investors are closing their wallets, lending less and sitting on the sidelines.

The Wall Street Journal reported this past July that the number of commercial real estate transactions in second-quarter 2022 fell by 22% year over year — a sign that higher interest rates are directly impacting deal flow as investors express concern over future market conditions. When this happens, it gets more difficult for real estate owners to raise capital.
The result is that mortgage brokers working with local entrepreneurs to purchase a neighborhood shopping center or apartment building are struggling to find capital for such projects. While an investor can ask their friends and family to fund these transactions, there are downsides to mixing money and personal relationships.
Brokers can help their clients find needed financial support by tapping into a select group of noninstitutional capital providers that offer small-balance joint venture equity. These lenders may be the perfect solution for many investors in the sub-$5 million space. The challenge is that brokers and borrowers may be unaware that this type of equity is available to them — or what it entails.
A joint venture involves two or more parties agreeing to pool their resources to accomplish a business goal. For real estate transactions, joint venture equity deals involve a general partner (GP), whose role is to source, close and execute the business plan on a given project, and a joint venture (JV) partner, who is responsible for making investments to fund the project in question.

Instead of needing to raise $1 million from 10 close friends, a JV partner allows a smaller real estate owner to have one partner who can provide all the required funds.

The benefit of being a GP is that there is tremendous upside and ownership stake without the need to contribute a large share of the total equity for a project. GPs are paid based on their performance, so the more value they create, the more money they will make. The benefit of being a JV partner is owning real estate without the need to be active on a day-to-day basis.

Pros and cons

The most important aspect of having a JV partner is to work with someone who can financially support the real estate project. While it is common for owners to raise capital from their network of contacts, this can become burdensome, constrain deal size and even cause friction between people close to the general partner.
Instead of needing to raise $1 million from 10 close friends, a JV partner allows a smaller real estate owner to have one partner who can provide all the required funds. Additionally, some JV partners will provide “net worth” requirements for loans that the GP may not be able to obtain using their own balance sheet.
The biggest downside to having a JV partner usually involves the GP losing some of the control they have over the property and the general direction of the deal. For example, it is common for a JV partner to have the final say regarding when a sale or refinance can occur, as well as issues involving a major tenant lease.
This won’t cause problems if the partners are aligned on their goals and desires, but if they are at odds, it is typical for the joint venture partner to be the final decisionmaker. In summation, when bringing in a JV partner, the general partner is giving up full control of a deal and may have to follow the joint venture partner’s direction.

How it works

The following example will help to explain how such a deal works. Oliver, the general partner, is under contract to purchase a local apartment building for $2 million. He has a lender lined up to provide a $1.3 million (65%) first mortgage. For Oliver to complete the purchase, he will need to come to closing with $700,000 (35%) in cash.
If Oliver has the $700,000, he may want to purchase the property outright to retain full control. On the other hand, if he either doesn’t have the capital or wants to spread his money across multiple deals, he may want to consider bringing in a JV equity partner.

JV equity has been used for decades in the institutional lending space, but it isn’t as readily available in the private money space. This is because most JV equity providers have a minimum check size.

Let’s assume that Oliver is able to find a small-balance JV partner who will fund 100% of the equity infusion. In this case, the equity partner will provide the $700,000 needed to purchase the property. They’ll also receive a 6% preferred payment and own 70% of the asset. Meanwhile, Oliver will perform all the day-to-day management duties, or sweat equity, and own 30% of the property.
In this example, the JV partner is earning a 6% return on their money and 70% of the upside in the transaction. In other words, once the JV receives a 6% return on their investment, they would receive 70% of all profits above that level, while the GP receives 30% of the proceeds, also called a promote.

Annual cash flow

Oliver turns out to be a really good operator, spending every day at the property renovating units. He has been able to push up rents, thereby increasing the overall value of the property.
Because of this, the property now has a net operating income of $150,000. Since the property has positive cash flow, the proceeds will be disbursed.
First, the debt will need to be paid. For this scenario, let’s use a 4% interest rate with a 30-year amortization. The annual debt payment will be approximately $75,000. This will leave $75,000 of available cash flow. Second, the JV partner will receive a 6% return on their original equity investment for a return of $42,000 (6% of $700,000). This will leave $33,000 in cash left to be distributed.
The remaining $33,000 will be split 70/30 (70% to the JV and 30% to the GP). Oliver, the GP, will receive a check for $9,900 and the JV will receive a check for $23,100. In total, the JV received $65,100 (a 9.3% profit on their initial investment) and Oliver earned $9,900.

Time to sell

Five years have gone by. Oliver has continued to manage the property, creating a better living space for his tenants and successfully increasing the net operating income to $200,000.
The GP and JV have come together and decided to sell the property for $3,333,333 (6% cap rate). To keep this example simple, there is no consideration to any accrued interest, capital account paydowns or closing costs at the time of the sale.
When it comes to dividing up the money, the first mortgage balance will have to be paid off. It is approximately $1,175,000. This would leave $2,158,333 of equity remaining. The next payout would go to the JV partner, who would retain their initial $700,000 investment, now leaving $1,458,333 of equity remaining. This profit would then be split in the same 70/30 fashion, with the JV partner receiving the larger share of $1,020,833 and the GP receiving 30%, or $437,500.
It would be safe to assume that the JV partner is extremely satisfied with their return. As for Oliver, who put no money into the deal, he is walking away with not only the annual profit but a $437,500 gain on the sale.

Finding funding

JV equity has been used for decades in the institutional space, but it isn’t as readily available in the private money space. This is because most JV equity providers have a minimum check size, ranging from $5 million to $10 million, as they stand to gain greater returns by investing larger amounts. This leaves a void in the private sector.
Commercial mortgage brokers need to be aware of the select capital providers that offer small-balance JV equity. When looking for the appropriate JV partner, brokers should ask for referrals from industry colleagues, read online reviews and testimonials, and make sure to speak directly to the joint venture partner.
Some things to ask an equity provider about include their structure, required control rights, expectations for cash returns, promote structure, investment philosophy, due-diligence process and time frame to close. A JV equity partnership needs to be beneficial to both the GP and the JV partner, so it is important that investment plans and values are aligned.
For example, if one of the parties is looking for a short-term hold and the other is looking for a long-term hold, there will be friction. Ensure that each party has the same intentions to provide a smooth relationship.
With JV equity available in small-balance sizes, the potential is growing for private investors in the commercial real estate market. To make deals run as smoothly as possible, mortgage brokers need to make sure that the interests and philosophies of JVs and GPs are aligned. Brokers need to know that the keys to making smaller asset purchases accessible to all types of investors lies in educating owners and operators on how to use this type of financing and where to find it. ●

The post Hidden Treasures appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
To the Rescue https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/to-the-rescue/ Fri, 01 Jul 2022 09:00:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/uncategorized/to-the-rescue/ Fast capital can save the day for a faltering deal

The post To the Rescue appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Imagine this scenario: An investor spends months scouring the market for the perfect property, issuing countless letters of interest and getting an agreement of sale in place. They obtain contractor quotes, pitch equity partners and secure capital — only to find that the lender decides to back out of the deal at the last minute.

Commercial mortgage brokers know this scenario all too well. Being forced to scramble at the eleventh hour to replace an investor or a lender can have catastrophic repercussions. Unfortunately, due to geopolitical uncertainty, rising interest rates and market volatility, this is becoming a commonplace occurrence in today’s real estate market.
The difference between novice investors and brokers, and those with experience, is how they act once faced with this inevitable circumstance. Having alternative funding options such as rescue capital in one’s back pocket can make the difference between bringing a deal over the finish line or falling short at the very end.

Having alternative funding options such as rescue capital in one’s back pocket can make the difference between bringing a deal over the finish line or falling short at the very end.

There are multiple uses for rescue capital. Additionally, commercial mortgage brokers and their clients should have insights for ensuring that lenders follow through in closing a deal. This will help them avoid being in a position where rescue capital is needed.

Financial life preserver

Rescue capital is a deal’s financial life preserver. It’s a quick capital infusion brought in most often when either a major investor pulls out of a deal or a lender decides not to fund the transaction. It can be the difference between a deal going forward or collapsing.
Because rescue capital is needed within a matter of days, borrowers will typically go through a private lender instead of a traditional bank. Lenders that provide rescue capital can fund transactions without lengthy due-diligence periods, the usual required reports or investment-committee decisions.
In exchange for speed and surety of execution, rescue capital is often more expensive than conventional financing and is only part of the deal for a short period of time. Since rescue capital is only needed to help with closing, it is common for it to be replaced shortly thereafter with conventional financing.
Structures for these types of loans are similar to that of a bridge loan. Leverage is in the 60% to 70% range, with terms as short as one month and as long as five years. Pricing varies based on the property, risk level and time frame, but it is typical for interest rates to be in the high single digits or low double digits.

Case studies

Let’s explore two case studies that describe the use of rescue capital. First, a company looking to acquire an office building in Atlanta almost lost the deal when the original lender decided not to provide funds just days before closing. The investor worked with a small-balance private lender to obtain rescue capital in less than one week. The deal was ultimately successful and the borrower began the process of refinancing the rescue capital with conventional debt.
In a second example, a buyer closing on multifamily housing in Chicago had a nationwide lender lined up to provide financing, but the necessary third-party reports had not come back in time. The lender was not prepared to close without those reports and the seller was not willing to offer an extension.
The buyer had only 10 days to find a new lender and needed a lifeline. Fortunately, a private lender stepped in and was able to provide the capital needed to close. Within two weeks, the nationwide lender provided a loan to refinance the rescue capital.
Finding the appropriate rescue-capital provider is imperative for ensuring that the process goes smoothly. Mortgage brokers should help investors in this process by sharing their recommendations. Brokers and investors should do their due diligence by learning all they can about a capital provider — including details of past deals, talking to others who have worked with the lender, reading online reviews and speaking directly to the lender to understand whether they have the capital ready to be deployed in the necessary time frame.
If an investor gets the feeling that their chosen lender is getting cold feet, they should act fast to find an alternative capital solution. The sooner a borrower acts, the better chance their broker has in securing the needed capital.

Moving parts

Buying real estate is like a big game of chess. There are many moving parts to a property transaction and savvy investors must think five moves ahead.
To avoid having a lender back out in the late stages, a borrower should first and foremost be upfront and realistic about the market in question as well as their financial projections, previous experience and overall goals. The lender will do their due diligence on both the borrower and the property, so it’s always better to provide a clear and honest picture from the start.
For example, if an investor tells a lender that their net worth is $5 million, but in reality it’s only $100,000, then the original term sheet will be discarded. In another instance, an investor might claim that market rents for a property are $2 per square foot, but if in actuality they are only $1 per square foot, then a lender is unlikely to finance the deal.
Even if the borrower perfectly represents their assets, goals, projected earnings and other aspects of the deal, there are many things outside their control that could sway a lender’s decision. These can range from property-level matters such as an appraisal coming in too low, global issues such as war, the broader economy or a pandemic. Understanding national and international affairs is just as important as understanding one’s business plan when searching for a mortgage.

Staying involved

It’s the job of both the broker and the investor to remain involved with their lender throughout the entire process, right up to closing. Borrowers and brokers should speak directly with loan decisionmakers to know their needs regarding documentation, timing and approvals.
Many lenders have investment-committee meetings where they give final approval for loans. The investor has the right to know when these meetings take place and to be updated upon completion. If a lender decides it is no longer comfortable with the initial loan proposal, borrowers have a couple options. First, they can try to get the lender more comfortable with the deal. Maybe the lender would feel better if the leverage was decreased from 70% to 65%, or if a six-month interest reserve was added.
Creativity is often key in closing a deal. By putting in the effort and showing a lender they are committed to the project, a borrower could turn the tides. But if the lender no longer has an interest in providing a loan on the subject property, rescue capital may be the only hope.
● ● ●
Although rescue capital is not the first choice for mortgage brokers or their clients, it can help pull an investor out of a jam if a lender gets cold feet right before closing. To avoid needing rescue capital in the first place, investors should have a solid understanding of the market before requesting funds, frequently check in with their lender and speak directly with decisionmakers. When all is said and done, having a rescue-capital provider lined up as a backup plan is always worthwhile. ●

The post To the Rescue appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
Fill Gaps in the Capital Stack https://www.scotsmanguide.com/commercial/fill-gaps-in-the-capital-stack/ Tue, 01 Feb 2022 08:34:00 +0000 https://www.scotsmanguide.com/uncategorized/fill-gaps-in-the-capital-stack/ Alternative financing options for small-balance investors are gaining traction

The post Fill Gaps in the Capital Stack appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>
With life beginning to return to some form of post-pandemic normal and businesses reopening their offices nationwide, demand for commercial real estate has been on the rise. Mortgage brokers can see evidence of this trend from a variety of data sources.

Real Capital Analytics recently reported that a record level of commercial real estate — including multifamily housing, office buildings, retail centers, e-commerce distribution centers and more — was purchased in third-quarter 2021. Commercial property sales for the first nine months of 2021 rose to $462 billion, up 10% compared to the same period in 2019 and the highest sales volume in history for this nine-month period.
As the U.S. economy continues to recover from the shock waves of COVID-19, commercial mortgage lenders and investors of all stripes are looking for a piece of the emerging real estate market. Unfortunately, the playing field is heavily tipped in favor of institutional investors that have almost unlimited access to funds to complete their capital stacks, particularly in regard to preferred equity and mezzanine debt financing. But this may be changing.
The key to democratizing the commercial real estate market is to educate borrowers and brokers who work in the sub-$5 million space. Commercial mortgage brokers and borrowers need to learn about the market for small-balance versions of preferred equity and mezzanine funding. They should know about the myriad capital options they can tap into, including preferred equity and mezzanine debt, which small-balance investors can use to complete their capital stacks. Small-balance lenders also need to understand these products to be able to provide the right services for their borrowers.

Understand the basics

It is important for lenders, brokers and borrowers to understand the differences between preferred equity and mezzanine debt before diving into this area. Preferred equity is usually structured as an investment in the ownership entity, where the preferred equity is senior to the common equity. In this structure, the preferred equity may have certain control rights and gets paid before the common equity. On the other hand, mezzanine financing, which is debt, is typically structured as a pledge of the ownership entity. In certain cases, a lien also may be recorded against the property.
In terms of pay structure, preferred equity and mezzanine financing each hold senior positions to common equity and are subordinate to the first-mortgage debt. The reason that these two financing tools are combined into one concept is because both are used to increase leverage on the property and to reduce the owner’s capital requirements.
The benefits and drawbacks of both types of financing tend to be one and the same — additional leverage. One main incentive is that property owners don’t have to invest as much of their own equity by using these types of financing tools. As less equity is invested in the deal, the yield will be increasingly higher. Additionally, owners can pull out equity from their existing properties and use it for new investments.

The key to democratizing the commercial real estate market is to educate borrowers and brokers who work in the sub-$5 million space.

Like any type of leverage, however, these types of financing are strategic tools. Lenders should be cautious and ensure that property owners only take on leverage that they can comfortably service. Since capital providers have rights and remedies if they are not repaid, owners and operators can actually go into default and, in a worst-case scenario, be forced into foreclosure.

Complete the stack

Traditional commercial real estate loans often provide about 70% of the total amount needed to purchase an asset, leaving it up to the borrower to come up with the additional 30%. For those who don’t have enough cash or want to increase their yields, preferred equity or mezzanine debt can provide buyers with additional financing.
As mentioned, such financing is a mix of debt and equity. It sits in a subordinate position to the first mortgage but is senior to the common equity contributed by the owner. In terms of repayment structure, while the first mortgage debt is often priced with interest of 4% to 7% and equity usually earns 18% to 25% returns, preferred equity and mezzanine debt financing typically have returns in the 10% to 15% range. This structure can be negotiated but is often split between a current portion and an accrued portion.
This type of financing is useful in several situations, such as when buyers cannot write the entire equity check themselves. These options also can be used when borrowers want to spread their capital across multiple deals or when they want to take cash out of their existing properties.

Hypothetical deals

Take the following acquisition scenario as an example of how this type of financing can be used. Nancy is under contract to purchase a neighborhood shopping center for $2 million and has a lender lined up to provide $1.4 million (70%) for the first mortgage. For Nancy to complete the purchase, she will need $600,000 (the remaining 30%) in cash.
Alternatively, Nancy may want to consider bringing in a preferred equity or mezzanine debt provider to help her bridge the gap. Assuming that this source is comfortable going up to 85% of the purchase price, they would be willing to provide her with a $300,000 capital investment. This would mean that Nancy now has leverage of $1.7 million ($1.4 million from the first mortgage and $300,000 from the preferred equity or mezzanine debt). Nancy now only has to come to closing with $300,000 of her own money.
In a refinance scenario, Jim purchased an apartment building for $1 million and spent the past year renovating the property. He successfully increased the net operating income and now the asset has a value of $1.5 million. Jim has increased his equity in the property and can use preferred equity or mezzanine debt financing in much the same way that someone would use a home equity line of credit to pull cash out of their primary residence.
Let’s assume that Jim has an existing loan balance of $700,000 after purchasing the property for $1 million, or 70% of the original value. Now a lender might be comfortable providing Jim with preferred equity or mezzanine debt that would boost his leverage to 85% of the new value for a total loan of $1,275,000. This would allow Jim to cash out $575,000.

Find funding

These types of financing tools have been used for decades by institutional investors but haven’t yet trickled down to Main Street. This is because most providers have a $5 million minimum loan amount and stand to gain greater returns by writing larger checks. The result is that they often disregard the needs of small-balance investors.
But times are changing. There are lenders that offer small-balance financing of this type. There are even a few that specifically operate in the sub-$5 million space. Some examples of recent closings include a $1.6 million mezzanine loan on an office building in Houston, a $400,000 mezzanine loan on an apartment building in Tampa and a $150,000 preferred equity investment on an apartment building in Miami.
When mortgage brokers go in search of the appropriate lender, ask for referrals from local real estate brokers and industry colleagues, read online reviews and testimonials, and make sure to speak directly to the lender. Debt and equity providers involved in this sector should be ready to share information about their deal structures, pay rates and due-diligence processes. They need to make sure that borrowers understand all the nuances of this type of financing. They should be prepared to explain their time frame for closing and, importantly, what happens if things don’t turn out as planned.
● ● ●
The potential for private investors in the commercial real estate market is growing now that such loans are available in small-balance sizes. Ultimately, the key to making commercial asset purchases accessible to all types of investors lies in educating borrowers on how to use these types of financing and where to find them. ●

The post Fill Gaps in the Capital Stack appeared first on Scotsman Guide.

]]>